Head of Product / workspace
friday · may 8

Quiet afternoon, Pavel.

One thread waiting on a verdict — the LinkedIn post about the procurement reel — and nothing's late. Three things resolved since you last looked.

↵
/ skills @ files ⌘K palette
01

Activity

21
2026-05-04overduelinkedin · manual
LinkedIn post about the procurement reel — verdict still pending
linkedin.com/posts/mattgy_the-final-step-in-the-procurement-journey · checked 2h ago · 1 conversation
2026-05-08resolvedmemory
Waiting for Josep email
replied yesterday — equity term sheet redraft confirmed for May 12
2026-05-08resolvedmemory
Don't show it again
duplicate notification suppressed — preference saved
2026-05-08resolvedhubspot pull v1
Solved. No longer needed — done next sprint.
moved to Sprint 22 backlog · Tri owns the import path
2026-05-07stalledawssome equity
Waiting for response with latest changes from Josep the lawyer
last touch 2 days ago · Josep travelling Mon–Wed
2026-05-07resolveddotpm editor rewrite
No longer a todo list
decision shipped · TipTap migration brief drafted
2026-05-07resolveddotpm v1
No longer on the list
scope cut after Mar 27 spike · folded into V1.1 plan
2026-05-07resolvedhubspot pull v1
Already done
closed by Tri · see AWS-432 changelog
2026-05-07resolvedproduct os mcp
Done
MCP feeds dotpm V1 workflow engine
showing 9 of 21 · show all
Claude Code · edfe4103 · started May 4, 5:18 PM
claude

Two artifacts could come out of the AWS-573 diagnosis.

  • Comment on AWS-573 (Optimaze bug, in Triage since Apr 17) — explains it's likely a legacy APN account, not an AWS-523 regression. Asks Tri to pull ListPartners response to confirm.
  • New Linear brief (project at idea stage) — Legacy APN portal migration, for the systemic gap Michael flagged as #7 with unknown exposure.

Two different scopes. Which do you want me to draft?

AskUserQuestion "Which scope: comment, brief, both?" 3 options
User skipped — no selection.
you
give me a one-word steer
claude

Pick one.

comment Draft the AWS-573 comment
brief Draft the new Linear project at idea stage
size Draft the Teams message to Louis + Michael asking for exposure first
all three Draft all three — you review before anything goes live
Recommendation

size first. Until we know how many pipeline customers actually have legacy APN accounts, the brief is guessing at scope and the AWS-573 comment is missing a key data point.

One Teams message to Louis and Michael unblocks both.

claude

Drafting the Teams message now. First pass — three lines, tight, asks one specific thing

AWS-573 transcript
↵